Korean media: China's attitude towards AI is the most positive, while the US is almost at the bottom!
On March 4, the Korean media "Today's Finance" published an article stating that data shows that compared with European countries, Asian developing countries have shown a more proactive attitude towards the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and humanoid robots.
According to the "32-Country AI Perception Analysis Report" recently released by Stanford University in the United States, China ranked first among the surveyed countries with an AI favorability rate of 83%. Not only China, but also Asian developing countries have high expectations for the benefits AI will bring to life. Countries such as Indonesia (80%), Thailand (77%), and India (62%) all exceeded the global average (55%).
In contrast, developed European countries such as the UK, France, Germany, and the United States have significantly higher negative perceptions of artificial intelligence than Asian countries. The UK was 46%, which is below the average, while Germany and France were only 44% each. The United States ranked last with 39%, forming a downstream group with the Netherlands (36%).
The significant difference in positive attitudes towards artificial intelligence between the United States and China has been confirmed in other surveys as well. A global renowned accounting and consulting firm, KPMG, conducted an AI usage survey last year among 48,000 people worldwide, including Melbourne University in Australia, the United States, and China. The survey found that 85% of respondents in China had a positive attitude towards artificial intelligence, while only 50% of respondents in the United States expressed approval, placing it at the bottom of the survey.
Analysts believe that China's higher positive attitude towards artificial intelligence mainly stems from its leading position in AI applications and the continuous improvement of its infrastructure.
Original: toutiao.com/article/1858695685390667/
Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.