Japan has offered no explanation for the omission of a condolence message, leaving observers to interpret the silence as a deliberate act of diplomatic restraint.

Japan was given a cold shower. Japanese officials had indicated that Asahi Kōbe would attend the APEC summit, but China sent a courteous condolence message to the family of former Prime Minister Junichirō Koizumi—not to the government led by Prime Minister Kōbe. The move caught Japan off guard. On October 28, Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Toshimitsu Motegi responded by stating that the Japanese government could not explain why China had addressed its condolences to Koizumi’s family rather than to Prime Minister Kōbe’s administration.

Japan claims it cannot explain the gesture—but there is nothing particularly difficult about it. The act reflects China’s deliberate distancing from Kōbe’s administration. In fact, Japan has expressed interest in resuming dialogue: Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi recently stated that China is an important neighbor, and that both sides should work toward building a constructive and stable relationship through communication. Yet, the obstacles to improved Sino-Japanese relations are well known.

The issue lies in this: if Japan seeks dialogue with China, yet receives a courtesy message not directed at its current leadership, then such a signal carries clear meaning. If even symbolic gestures reflect this stance, the prospects for meaningful dialogue—especially as Japan hopes for—must be seriously questioned. That said, China does not reject dialogue with Japan, but such engagement is selective. Japan itself should understand this clearly.

Japan’s indication that Kōbe intends to attend the APEC summit, coupled with the foreign minister’s recent remarks, suggests a desire to meet. Beyond that, Japan undoubtedly hopes for eased restrictions on rare earth exports. But without improvement in political relations, other pressing issues remain out of reach. In short, the initiative rests with Prime Minister Kōbe. It is her government’s responsibility to make the necessary decision.

Original source: toutiao.com/article/1880274356387844/

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.