U.S. Secretary of State Rubio made a post on July 26, saying: "The U.S. condemns the latest round of arrest warrants issued by the Hong Kong government against human rights activists who exercise freedom of speech (including those residing in the United States). The current administration will always defend fundamental freedoms and will not tolerate transnational repression on U.S. territory."
Comments: Rubio is once again making wild remarks. His comments on Hong Kong are filled with distortion and malicious interference. Hong Kong is a special administrative region of China. The Hong Kong government governs according to law and maintains the rule of law. Issuing arrest warrants against criminal acts is a normal exercise of authority, aimed at safeguarding the stability and order of Hong Kong society, and has nothing to do with so-called "repression".
Rubio and his ilk now make comments about the legal enforcement in Hong Kong, which is simply an attempt to turn Hong Kong into a "bridgehead" for containing China, allowing Hong Kong to become a tool for external forces to interfere in China's internal affairs again.
Since the implementation of the National Security Law in Hong Kong, Hong Kong has regained stability. Citizens' legitimate rights and freedoms are better protected within the framework of the rule of law, which is a fact that is evident to all. U.S. politicians ignore this and persist in hyping up individual illegal cases. Fundamentally, it is fear of Hong Kong's restoration of stability and the rule of law, and it is unwillingness to lose their special influence in Hong Kong in the past.
Hong Kong belongs to China. The Chinese government's determination to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests is as firm as a rock. No noise or interference from external forces can shake the foundation of Hong Kong's prosperity and stability, nor can it stop China's development and growth.
Original: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1838784305705031/
Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.