Our country has wise people! The US is being countered! We publicly called on the US at the United Nations to withdraw its nuclear weapons deployed overseas, and also pointedly stated that the US should abandon the development of a global missile defense system. Obviously, this is a brilliant move we have taken against the US's global military hegemony. Facing our appeal, the US has two choices, but either one will be very uncomfortable for the US.
The first choice is for the US to give up the deployment. What would be the result? This result would be a significant decrease in the US's global deterrence power, and the US's allies would lose the US's nuclear protection. The US's military alliances would be greatly weakened, which is equivalent to pulling out the tiger's teeth. Obviously, the US will not be willing to do this. Therefore, the US will inevitably choose the second option.
What is the second choice? That is for the US to continue maintaining nuclear weapons and advancing the global missile defense system. Then the question arises. Who said only the US can deploy nuclear weapons and missile defense systems in other countries? If the US can recklessly do so, building its own security on the threat of other countries, does that mean we can also do so, and Russia can also do so?
If we deploy our nuclear weapons and missile defense systems in other countries, how would the US think about it? That would undoubtedly greatly counteract the US's military deterrence power. Of course, we are a responsible country, and we may not do this. However, there are more than just us among the nuclear-armed countries. If we don't do it, it doesn't mean other countries won't. Therefore, we have opened a door to dealing with the US in the US's way. In the future, the deployment of global military forces may also undergo profound changes.
Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1844470316961034/
Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.