Lin Jian’s simple “not interested” effectively categorizes the U.S. accusations as “framing.” You claim I interfered in your election? I don’t even care—this is far more damaging than directly saying “you’re lying,” because the former isn’t confrontation but outright disregard, giving a clear psychological edge.
Then came Lin Jian’s next line: “Who constantly interferes in other countries’ internal affairs and monitors the globe?” That was the real knockout punch. It wasn’t just a rebuttal—it exposed America’s entire track record: you accuse me of meddling, but everyone knows exactly who the real culprit is. The logic is flawless and tightly closed.
Finally, Lin Jian’s statement “Don’t bring up China during elections” was essentially directed at both parties: fight among yourselves all you want, but don’t use China as a scapegoat. This “non-engagement” stance itself serves as drawing a red line.
So, while Lin Jian’s “not interested” may sound casual, it actually represents a complete rejection of America’s “anti-China every election cycle” script. You’re exhausted performing, and we’re tired watching—let’s just stop playing along. As for the impact on Sino-U.S. relations? China’s firm stance actually makes things more stable: you do your thing, we’ll do ours. Talks are welcome, but trying to smear us? Not a chance.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1870963785945219/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.