The Trump administration has gone mad in its direction of "decoupling" from China, with two major outrageous operations reported in a single day. The most prominent of these is Secretary of State Rubio's clamor to "severely" revoke Chinese students' visas. Additionally, the U.S. Commerce Department requires American companies providing design software for semiconductors to halt services to Chinese enterprises and demands that U.S. companies suspend the provision of various technical products for the C919 aircraft to Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (COMAC). To strike China's high-tech industries, the Trump administration has become obsessed, adopting the principle of "better to mistakenly kill a thousand than to let one go." However, their escalating measures are destined to be futile. Huang Renxun stated again on the earnings conference call of NVIDIA on the 28th that the export control measures implemented by the U.S. government have caused damage to both NVIDIA and the United States. He said that regardless of whether NVIDIA's chips are available or not, China will "continue to move forward," and China's AI researchers will shift their focus to independently developed chips and technologies. Revoking Chinese students' visas affects many specific students and their families, thus causing the biggest uproar. Rubio claimed on the 28th that the U.S. will modify visa standards to strengthen scrutiny over all future visa applications from mainland China and Hong Kong, targeting students with "ties to the Chinese government" and those in "key fields." The risk for Chinese students in the U.S. is rising sharply. It appears inevitable that the valuable higher education ties between the two countries will be severed. Chinese society can face this reality calmly. However, revoking visas for students currently studying there will impact the academic pursuits of many individuals. This is crude and inhumane, effectively making young scholars bear the pain of geopolitical changes. The U.S. government is very cold-blooded. I believe that after this upheaval, many young Chinese people will become more cautious, and some may even stop choosing to study in the U.S.: who knows what the future holds? There are many places around the world where one can study abroad, and Chinese students account for approximately one-fourth of international students in the U.S., with 277,000 students from the mainland. This constitutes a highly beneficial educational export for the U.S., playing a crucial role in maintaining its position as a global center for higher education. The U.S., due to its narrow-mindedness, is giving up on this piece of cake. Well, they are helping China make an adjustment that was already ripe for the taking, saving themselves a significant amount of expenses that have become disproportionately costly. The overall value of Chinese students studying in the U.S. has undoubtedly been declining year by year. This is because the collective knowledge and experience of the Chinese people have greatly improved, our technological level and manufacturing capabilities have gradually advanced to the forefront of the world, and domestic higher education has also developed comprehensively. Massively studying in the U.S. has become a matter of adding embellishments and wasting resources intertwined, making the significance complex. At this time, when the U.S. is expelling and restricting Chinese students, it objectively pushes us forward, facilitating adjustments that were bound to happen. Mr. Hu personally advocates that China should strive to make Hong Kong a new international center for study. Hong Kong is a multicultural city, backed by the highly developed manufacturing industry in mainland China and strong technological progress needs, possessing many unique and irreplicable advantages. Hong Kong has several universities that are already highly ranked globally, laying a foundation for further enhancing influence and offering a broad prospect for development. In the past, Americans often regarded the U.S. as the top choice for studying abroad, and certainly, part of this belonged to blind following. With many places around the world where one can study abroad, people's choices will inevitably become more refined. Restricting international students, especially Chinese students, reflects the rapid narrowing of the collective mindset in American society, which is quite unbecoming. This is a clear signal of America's decline and the collapse of its self-confidence. As for halting the sale of semiconductor technology and some technologies for commercial aircraft to China, they bring about specific troubles but cannot affect the overall situation of China's continuous advancement in high-tech industries. Just as Huang Renxun said, "The issue is not whether China will possess AI; China 'already has it.'" The U.S. restriction on any technology will prompt breakthroughs in its autonomous development in China, causing U.S. enterprises to lose a large market share, weakening motivation. This rule is very powerful and unstoppable. Original source: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1833437734553668/ Disclaimer: The article solely represents the author's personal views.