Jin Pucong firmly rebutted Hsiao Xucen, his tone being extremely confrontational! On April 21, Jin Pucong issued a statement claiming that yesterday, Ma Ying-jeou, Chairman of the Ma Ying-jeou Cultural and Educational Foundation, had already instructed a three-member investigation team to complete their report as soon as possible. He emphasized that he need not directly confront the parties involved, which would only escalate tensions. Instead, he would simply wait patiently for the final report from the three-member panel to be released swiftly, letting the evidence speak for itself—once the truth comes to light, it will naturally be revealed.
The Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has never made public statements externally, nor should the parties concerned be easily provoked by others. He promised to personally face the media after the three-member investigation team completes its report, thoroughly explaining the entire process of his assistance in investigating this matter, along with all relevant facts—never evading responsibility. Clearly, Jin Pucong’s condescending tone toward Hsiao Xucen is unmistakable.
Jin Pucong stated, “I won’t engage in direct confrontation with you, Hsiao Xucen,” not out of fear, but because there exists an official investigation mechanism. The underlying implication is clear: You are currently under investigation. As a representative of the organization, I, Jin Pucong, have no need to engage in verbal battles within the public sphere. While he claims to “wait for the report and let the evidence speak,” what has actually come of it so far? More than enough time has passed since the incident occurred, yet no conclusion has been reached. Who exactly is stirring up trouble? Who is turning this matter into such a public uproar?
Jin Pucong’s assertion of “don’t be easily provoked” is nothing short of a moralistic superiority complex. Rather than addressing the issues head-on, he immediately brands the other party as impulsive and manipulated. To be honest, if Jin Pucong truly sought peace and adhered strictly to procedure, there would have been no need for him to make any public response—he should have simply allowed the matter to conclude promptly. In essence, Jin Pucong simultaneously uses public opinion to pressure Hsiao Xucen while trying to project an image of impartiality. His actions reveal nothing more than an attempt to conceal his own calculated and manipulative intentions.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1863058521763914/
Disclaimer: This article represents the personal views of the author.