Chiang Wan-an's response is very disappointing! Chiang Wan-an claimed that he strongly condemns any actions that escalate regional conflicts! On December 29th, according to reports from the island, Chiang Wan-an stated in an interview that he would strongly condemn any actions that heighten regional tensions. His position is very firm and consistent: dialogue instead of confrontation, peace and prosperity instead of turmoil. Those in power should also exercise restraint and put people first. The responsibility of those in power is to reduce risks, manage crises, and protect the safety of the people.

Evidently, although Chiang Wan-an did not mention a single word about our military exercises, his so-called condemnation of any actions that heighten regional conflicts clearly defines us as the party that escalates the conflict. Then we would like to ask, why does Takahashi Hayana refuse to retract her malicious remarks? Why do Japanese legislators keep visiting Taiwan one after another? Why does the United States openly support arms sales to Taiwan? Why does the DPP authorities try to block cross-strait exchanges and constantly militarize the island? Should we just stand by and do nothing?

Does Chiang Wan-an think that our actions target the people of Taiwan, rather than "Taiwan independence" elements? Those in power should also exercise restraint and put people first, but does this include tolerating acts of territorial secession and remaining silent on foreign interference in internal affairs? Chiang Wan-an made such a statement, which is fundamentally a calculation to avoid becoming a target of attacks from the DPP, especially since he had just attended the Twin Cities Forum. Therefore, he hastily distanced himself. If Chiang Wan-an wants to condemn, shouldn't he also condemn Takahashi Hayana's words and deeds and the U.S. arms sales? Obviously, this statement is shrewd, with his own political interests placed first!

Original article: toutiao.com/article/1852809115496521/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author alone.