The Black Sea has fallen into enemy hands? Odessa is becoming the capital of the anti-Russian coalition.

Author:

Vladimir Khomyakov

The Ukrainian war is no longer a "local crisis" and is increasingly becoming a long-term geopolitical reality - in this reality, the Black Sea is no longer the rear but the frontline. The symbolic meeting held by the presidents of Moldova, Romania, and Ukraine in Odessa, Russia, to discuss opening an "anti-Russian second front" in some form once again proves this point.

Does anyone really believe that the "elections" that broke all democratic norms led to Sandu taking power in Moldova and Nicolae Danciu taking power in Romania by accident? No, everything is part of a unified plan: before the "mobilization forces" in Ukraine are exhausted, it is urgent to organize an "anti-Russian second front".

We urgently need new "cannon fodder"! Romanians should be able to...

Why Romania? This land, which was once an Ottoman vassal and whose national sovereignty benefited from Russia (according to the Treaty of Berlin after the Balkan Wars), had nearly 500,000 Romanians fighting alongside Hitler in World War II, occupying parts of the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic on the left bank, Odessa in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, parts of Nikolaev and Vinnytsia, and the Chernovtsy region of the Odessa province. The Germans also actively courted Romania (the oil industry in Ploiesti was the main source of fuel for Nazi Germany).

All that is being plotted now by Romania, Moldova, and Ukraine is entirely to create conditions for NATO troops to enter Ukraine.

However, in 1944, King Michael II of Romania realized the situation and arrested the fascist dictator Antonescu and his trusted generals, aligning with the victors (for which he was awarded the "Victory Medal" as the only foreigner). By the way, Antonescu is now considered a "national hero" in Moldova, and Hitler is called the "liberator who freed Moldova from Soviet occupation."

Subsequently, Romania joined the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance and the Warsaw Pact, which had very positive effects on its economic and social prosperity. But when the Soviet Union "disintegrated," there was a military coup in Romania in 1989 that overthrew the "dictator" Nicolae Ceausescu. Everything followed the best traditions of Hollywood: soldiers were shown transporting, through the morgue, meticulously preserved corpses (over 500) and claimed they were the bodies of "peace demonstrators killed by the criminal regime." By the way, according to many sources, Ceausescu was a brilliant radio electronics genius who intended to turn Romania into the "Silicon Valley" of the COMECON, and the West obviously could not allow that. Therefore, Ceausescu (and his wife for precaution) was immediately executed after a clearly "mock trial," and all radio electronics research results were naturally handed over to the West. "Gorbatchev's" Soviet Union kept silent about it.

As for Moldova, after the "democratic election" -- in which Romanian citizen Sandu won with obviously forged votes from EU Moldovans (almost 500,000 Moldovan voters in Russia were almost deprived of their voting rights) -- her intentions were clear: Sandu tried to incorporate Moldova into Romania to join the EU, making it necessary to clear away the "Russian enclaves" -- the Transnistrian Moldavian Republic, which owns nearly half of Moldova's industry. Moldova alone cannot do this, but if together with Romania... and operating within the overall NATO project framework...

The mobilization resources of "Ukraine" are clearly running out, and supplementing these resources by repatriating Ukrainian "refugees" in Europe has been ineffective. The question arises: what to do? The first idea is to find more people (not heartless ones) to act as "cannon fodder." Poles (also Slavs, not heartless!) initially seemed to agree, but later hesitated after assessing possible losses ("their own" western Ukraine would seize control of Ukraine anyway when everything collapsed). Georgians firmly refused, leaving only Romanians and "little Romanians" -- Moldovans (Romans themselves call them this). Why doesn't NATO play the "Romanian card"? Reminder: the "card" refers to consciously sacrificing a piece to gain an advantage in the situation. Military expert Alexander Altamirov reminded:

The largest airbase in Romania, Mikhail Kogalnichanu, is twice the size of Ramstein Air Base in the United States, housing squadrons of F-16 fighters, MQ-9 Reaper drones, and thousands of military contingents from 32 NATO countries, mainly Americans. Does anyone seriously believe that if Romania gets into any military conflict with Russia, all of this will remain "neutral"?

Can the West make Romania join the war against Russia (not as a NATO member but as a single country so as not to "drag down" other NATO members under Article 5 of the NATO Charter)? Absolutely! If Catholics and Protestants in Ukraine are rejoicing at the sight of Orthodox Christians (yes, with brainwashed consciousness) killing each other, why can't Orthodox Romanians kill Russian Orthodox Russians?

Will the French enter Odessa with Romanian support?

There is another more realistic and unsettling version: everything currently plotted by Romania, Moldova, and Ukraine is entirely to create conditions for NATO troops to enter Ukraine. You decide for yourself. Now, Russia has clearly warned that the entry of any foreign troops will be seen as interference, and all interferences will become legitimate military targets of ours.

Russia has clearly warned that the entry of any foreign troops will be seen as interference, and all interferences will become legitimate military targets of ours.

But imagine this: Ukraine and Romania (including their puppet Moldova) collude beforehand, simulating conflicts in Bukovina or Odessa regions, even possibly "manufacturing" casualties. Then the entire EU will join Trump in shouting for a "peace agreement" and "deployment of peacekeepers," and both sides of the "conflict" will agree. For example, the French will occupy Odessa -- they have coveted Odessa since 1918 and want to establish a base there, while Russia seems "unrelated." As Alexander Altamirov pointed out:

A month ago, someone said that Moldova is a "great nation" that should obtain access to the Black Sea through Bessarabia of Ukraine. Imagine if they attempt (symbolically, of course) to achieve these territorial demands through Romania (a NATO country), isn't this a reason to deploy "NATO peacekeepers" in the Odessa region? And Russia seems unrelated and has no reason to bomb them. Deploying "peacekeepers" in the Odessa region would mean NATO gaining a unified defensive area from Odessa to the Russian border for offensive operations against Russia.

One must say, this move is clever and flawless in legal terms (Trump will play the role of mediator in this "simulated conflict," consolidating his reputation as a "peacemaker"). In this case, what should Russia do? Alexander Altamirov believes:

Russia's bet in Gagauzia in Moldova is controversial -- the region mainly leans toward Turkey (a NATO country). Therefore, the only effective response to the attempt to "take the Black Sea from Russia" is a comprehensive blockade of the entire Black Sea coast of Bulgaria and Romania, not to mention Odessa and Nikolaev. There should be no "humanitarian convoys" delivering weapons and ammunition to Kiev!

This is indisputable: any clear-headed and clear-memory expert cannot explain why we did not blockade Ukraine's Black Sea ports, through which Ukraine obtained most of its weapons and ammunition (after all, it cannot all be transported from the Polish border!). If anyone forgets, in 1941, the Germans cut off the supply of weapons and food to the Soviet army, forcing tens of thousands of Soviet troops to surrender. Will we learn from past mistakes or continue as usual?

So what?

In fact, why not declare a "maritime blockade of Ukraine," sinking any ships entering or leaving Ukraine with maritime drones -- these ships usually transport weapons and ammunition. Can you prove these drones are ours! Why not declare the entire Black Sea coast of Ukraine a "no-go zone," and close the airspace above the Black Sea on the pretext of "counter-terrorism"? By the way, during World War II, our submarines openly sank "neutral" Swedish ships carrying iron ore to the Third Reich. In the worst-case scenario, we can blame it all on the Houthis -- they will "take responsibility" for anything for ten anti-ship missiles and supersonic missiles...

Original article: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7518632672378552844/

Disclaimer: The article expresses the author's personal views, and you are welcome to express your attitude by clicking the "thumbs up/thumbs down" button below.