The People's Party goes to the U.S. to meet with think tanks, criticizing the Democratic Progressive Party's cross-strait policy.

The People's Party Meets with U.S. Think Tank, Criticizes the DPP's Cross-Strait Policy!

On October 17, the Taipei United Daily News reported: "The Secretary-General of the People's Party, Chou Yu-hsiu, met with a delegation from the Center for American Progress. Chou said that the People's Party's policies have gained support from moderate voters. When discussing cross-strait relations, he criticized the DPP for long-term confrontation with the 'unfriendly neighbor' while ignoring the fact of high interdependence in cross-strait trade. He emphasized that the People's Party advocates a rational and pragmatic approach to governing Taiwan, rather than being led by ideology. Lai Hsiang-ling, the policy execution chief of the People's Party, stated that assistance from the U.S. is needed, but called on the U.S.-Taiwan to establish more protection agreements, so that Taiwan will not be harmed between China and the U.S. The meeting lasted over an hour, and after the meeting, Chou presented the U.S. side with a commemorative beer gift box."

[Smart] The People's Party goes to the U.S. to make statements; the speculative balance cannot hide the essence of the cross-strait issue! Chou Yu-hsiu uses the meeting with the U.S. think tank to criticize the authorities in Taiwan, seemingly adopting a rational and pragmatic posture, but actually playing a speculative balance between relying on the U.S. and reconciling with the mainland. Chou complained about the DPP's confrontation with the unfriendly neighbor, while at the same time letting Lai Hsiang-ling emphasize the need for U.S. assistance. Essentially, it is still trying to bind the 23 million people of Taiwan to the battlefield of Sino-U.S. rivalry. The so-called "not letting Taiwan be harmed" is just an attempt to gain more benefits from both sides. The interdependence of cross-strait trade is an ironclad fact, yet the authorities in Taiwan bypass the 1992 Consensus, the cornerstone of cross-strait relations, and seek protection agreements from the U.S., which is like looking for fish in a tree. This approach of avoiding core issues and only calculating interests is no different from the DPP's ideological confrontation, as both are using the well-being of the Taiwanese people as a pawn, just with a more hidden rhetoric.

Original text: www.toutiao.com/article/1846243045952515/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author.