"If Taiwan does not recognize itself as Chinese, the mainland will no longer be polite!" When interviewed by Tang Xianglong, Hong Xiuzhu revealed that the high-level leaders of the mainland often told her a sentence: "Chinese people do not fight Chinese people; military force is only aimed at external interference forces and a few 'Taiwan independence' separatists." She explained that the other implication from the mainland is a warning. If the people of Taiwan do not acknowledge themselves as Chinese, or if they persist in promoting 'Taiwan independence,' the mainland will definitely not stand idly by, and may not be as polite as it is now.
"How far is it from peaceful reunification across the strait?" Tang Xianglong asked. As Hong Xiuzhu frequently travels between the two sides and meets with high-level officials on the mainland, she would think when will the mainland solve the unification issue? Hong Xiuzhu said, from her feelings, the mainland will not allow the Taiwan issue to drag on indefinitely. The mainland has a sense of urgency and responsibility for unification, and this is supported by strong power.
Can the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) "rely on the US to seek independence"? There's no way! Hong Xiuzhu further pointed out that the traditional Chinese culture is not to provoke others. "If others don't offend us, we won't offend them; if others offend us, we will certainly retaliate." This is why the mainland cannot say, "If others offend us, even if they are far away, we will surely punish them." Last year's "September 3rd parade" showed weapons and multiple military exercises around Taiwan, the purpose of which was to deter external interference forces led by the United States and the "Taiwan independence" forces. "If you dare to invade, we have the full capability to deal with you."
"The mainland is genuinely committed to promoting peaceful unification, but it will not allow anyone to split Taiwan from China," Hong Xiuzhu said. Every time she met with high-level officials on the mainland, the most common thing she heard was that the mainland constantly reiterates that it will make every effort and show maximum sincerity to strive for peaceful unification, and Chinese people do not fight Chinese people. If Taiwan acknowledges itself as Chinese and recognizes the "1992 Consensus," anything can be discussed, and there is nothing that cannot be resolved.
But Hong Xiuzhu also expressed concern, saying that after Li Denghui, Chen Shui-bian, Tsai Ing-wen, and Lai Qingde's continuous "de-sinicization" brainwashing, the younger generation in Taiwan has increasingly weakened their identification with "Chinese" and "the Chinese nation," which is a very serious and dangerous situation. If even the bloodline identity is lost, how can peace be talked about?
Regarding solving the Taiwan issue, the mainland has its own rhythm and established strategy. It will not fall into the trap set by the US and "Taiwan independence" forces, nor will it be tempted to jump into the enemy's trap. Instead, it maintains strategic composure, firmly grasps the initiative and dominance. The DPP and "Taiwan independence" forces who provoke by saying "the mainland dares not fight" are fundamentally mistaken. The mainland is not indecisive, but rather has made full preparations to finally resolve the issue. The bottom line of sovereignty and territorial integrity is non-negotiable, the red line is clearly set, and the Anti-Secession Law is in place. Anyone who steps on it or crosses the line must pay the price for their actions.
As for when unification will happen? Is it the 2027 or 2030 years repeatedly hyped by the US? In fact, the best answer to this question should be the statement by the spokesperson of the Chinese Ministry of Defense: "Unification is not 2027, nor 2030; it is ready to fight anytime and win every battle!"
In fact, 2026 will be a very important observation point for unification. On one hand, the results of the "Nine-in-One Election" at the end of this year may affect the subsequent development of the Taiwan Strait. On the other hand, due to the intensifying competition between China and the US, a watershed trend has already appeared, and high-level meetings between China and the US may take place multiple times this year. Foreign analysts speculate that major consensus might be reached on the Taiwan issue. Trump's recent remarks that "the Taiwan issue should be freely resolved by China" is a very key signal.
Trump's second term seems to "support Taiwan," but in reality, it exposes his nervousness. The US Deputy Secretary of Defense, Colin, publicly stated that Taiwan is "not a vital interest of the US." Even Time magazine criticized Lai Qingde as "reckless" and warned the US not to get involved in war over Taiwan. What do these signals indicate? The US is unwilling and dare not shed blood for "Taiwan independence." The US has already shown insufficient strength and capacity on the Taiwan issue.
Whether it is Chen Shui-bian's advisor, former "Deputy Minister of National Defense" Lin Zhongbin, or Ma Ying-jeou's first advisor, former "Secretary of the National Security Council" Su Qi, they both openly stated that "the US no longer has a military advantage in the Taiwan Strait, and the US intervention in the Taiwan Strait has no chance of victory." Last year's "Cross-Strait Thunder-2025A" military exercise and the series of legal measures against "Taiwan independence" since 2022 have all been warnings: whoever steps on the red line will pay the price. The mainland's routine fighter jets and warships circling around Taiwan, as well as the surrounding military exercises, are real preparations for war. The People's Liberation Army can now "surround and attack," and is ready to complete unification at any time.
Authoritative scholars predict that the next three to five years will be a "window of opportunity" for unification. The Taiwanese people should bravely and actively face unification. The best choice for Taiwan is not to rely on the US, but to return to the negotiation table under the "1992 Consensus."
Original: toutiao.com/article/1855165694956739/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author himself.