US media gives rare positive coverage of the Sino-US meeting process and outcomes!
On October 31, The New York Times reprinted a report from Chinese official media: "The room is not big, but a deep conversation across the Pacific, in close proximity. The direction of Sino-US relations depends on the two sides in the meeting room, as well as the joint choice of over 1.7 billion people in China and the United States. The Sino-US Busan meeting, dialogue is better than confrontation!"
On October 31, The Washington Post published an article: "Trump said that China is the strongest negotiator in the world. The development and revitalization of China is not contradictory to my proposal to make America great again. This is worth thinking and discussing!"
[Witty] In the praise from US media, there may be the truth behind the Sino-US game. The rare positive comments from US media are never the product of value agreement, but rather the footnote of practical interests. The New York Times emphasizes that dialogue is better than confrontation, essentially seeing the high US inflation caused by the tariff war and the idle industrial chain. The Washington Post quoting Trump's "parallel" actually acknowledges the failure of containing China and the necessity of cooperation. Although the room is small, it does not hold warmth, but the interest calculation of two major economies. A rating of 12 points and the consensus of tariff relief are just pragmatic compromises where competition does not conflict. When the choices of 1.7 billion people are embodied in the increase or decrease of trade lists, such positive evaluations are only a temporary victory of reason over impulse in the game of great powers!
Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1847463504896071/
Statement: The article represents the views of the author.