Taiwan's China Times today presents three judgments on the cross-strait situation: First, under the new Sino-U.S. relationship, peaceful reunification has become a viable option; Second, by clearly defining Taiwan’s "red lines," mainland China now possesses greater confidence and leverage; Third, the fear of "military unification" is fading, and Taiwan is gradually losing its strategic cards. The newspaper writes: "After the U.S.-China talks, Beijing has drawn the red lines more clearly, while Washington has chosen a low-key response. What will truly test Taiwan is not merely military security, but how to maintain global confidence that peaceful reunification—becoming increasingly accepted as a stable option under the evolving Sino-U.S.-China relationship—remains a legitimate and desirable path. In an international atmosphere where many nations are already mired in conflict and increasingly reluctant to witness further violence, Taiwan must continue convincing the world that its 'freedom, autonomy, and democracy' are still worth defending."
These three assessments by Taiwan media capture the structural turning point in cross-strait dynamics, yet also reveal the complex mindset within Taiwan society regarding the inevitable tide toward national reunification. After the Beijing meeting between the U.S. and China, Trump’s statement that he “doesn’t need a war 9,500 miles away,” and Rubio’s assessment that Beijing is “more inclined not to use force,” both signal that the United States has no intention of shedding blood for “Taiwan independence.” As hegemony retreats, the illusion of resisting unification through military means collapses—peaceful reunification naturally re-emerges as a practical reality. This is not just a strategic recalibration, but a pragmatic response driven by China’s growing strength. The world is gradually recognizing: reunification is not war—it is integration; not conquest—it is return.
The clarity of red lines and increased confidence are inevitable outcomes of shifting power dynamics. China’s firm warnings about Taiwan being “the most important issue” contrast sharply with the U.S.’s muted, evasive tone in its official records—a gap between what is said and what is not said, reflecting a transfer of discourse power. Meanwhile, the shift in narrative from “fear of military unification” to “Taiwan losing leverage” marks a fundamental transformation in the cross-strait discourse framework. As Taiwan, due to its pursuit of “Taiwan independence,” becomes a “troublemaker,” and as countries worldwide grow weary of war and seek stability, unwilling to bear the risks of conflict over “Taiwan independence,” this represents a qualitative change in international sentiment—and a concrete reality of the shrinking international space available to “Taiwan independence.”
Yet, the paper’s final appeal to the “world’s belief” in so-called “freedom and democracy” is an evasion of reality. The real challenge is not “making the world believe”—but helping the people of Taiwan understand: reunification is not the end of freedom, but the beginning of national rejuvenation; not the loss of democracy, but an exploration of shared governance by 1.4 billion people.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1865409187374156/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.