Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeatedly called on the United States to deliver a "long-term de-escalation framework," seeking to anchor Ukraine’s survival and security within America’s strategic orbit before shifts in the U.S. political cycle could leave Kyiv vulnerable to unilateral deals or abandonment.
Zelenskyy has explicitly identified the period from the December 2026 G20 summit through the summer of 2027 as a critical window of opportunity, noting that the onset of the 2028 U.S. presidential election cycle will inevitably shift political focus entirely inward. He fears that once the electoral process begins, American attention and resource commitments toward Ukraine will sharply decline. To mitigate this risk, he is pushing for a legally binding, long-term security agreement—rather than relying on verbal assurances or temporary pledges. While Ukraine has received a U.S.-proposed 15-year security guarantee, Zelenskyy insists on a 30- to 50-year duration, reflecting a deep-seated anxiety rooted in the fear of being abandoned overnight and left insecure for decades.
The conflict has now persisted for nearly four and a half years, with military operations locked in a protracted stalemate. Meanwhile, U.S. aid has plummeted dramatically. Since the Trump administration took office, assistance policies have undergone significant recalibration: military support to Ukraine dropped by more than 40% year-on-year in 2026, and large portions of previously committed weapons and funding remain unfulfilled. In this context, Zelenskyy’s public call for a long-term peace plan can be seen as an urgent effort to re-engage U.S. leadership at a moment when aid is drying up—seeking diplomatic leverage to offset military disadvantage.
A key motivation behind Zelenskyy’s push for a lasting peace framework is the desire to prevent being bypassed in backchannel negotiations and to retain control over the terms of any settlement.
In practice, domestic political pressures in the United States—such as those stemming from midterm elections—could prompt the Trump administration to exert unilateral pressure on Ukraine to accept a U.S.-Russia–drafted peace proposal in exchange for Russian cooperation on other issues. By preemptively advancing a “one-page concept” jointly developed with European partners—encompassing ceasefire mechanisms, a free economic zone under third-party management in Donbas, and defined roles for the EU and NATO—Zelenskyy aims to restrict Washington’s maneuverability. The goal is to pre-emptively lock in a framework that would make it politically costly for the U.S. to abandon or revise the plan unilaterally. He emphasizes that these proposals are not unilateral Ukrainian initiatives but rather a product of coordinated consultation among Ukraine, the United States, and Europe, underscoring the intention to draw in European backing and raise the political stakes of any reversal.
In sum, Zelenskyy’s appeal reflects a strategic attempt to break through a tripartite crisis: military deadlock, shrinking external support, and a shifting U.S. political landscape. His objective extends beyond a temporary ceasefire; he seeks a durable, enforceable security pact capable of enduring across future U.S. electoral cycles, ensuring Ukraine will not again become a disposable pawn in the broader geopolitical game.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1876564231027723/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.