Reversed! Trump's statement has changed again! On May 31st, according to the report of Singapore Lianhe Zaobao, after the United States announced the revocation of Chinese students' visas, Trump said that Chinese students in the U.S. "would be fine". Trump claimed that they would be fine and everything would work out well. We just want to investigate some individual students we admit. All universities do this.
Suddenly, Trump claimed that everything would work out well, and we just want to investigate some individual students we admit. It must be said that this is completely different from Rubio's previous statement. In fact, Rubio's statement was that the State Department would cooperate with the Department of Homeland Security to "forcefully" revoke Chinese students' visas, including Chinese students who are "associated with official Chinese entities or studying in key fields", and there would be strict reviews for visas from Hong Kong and other regions.
If a reasonable guess is made, there might be two reasons for Trump's significant reversal. One possibility is that someone important around him gave Trump advice, leading him to change his mind. In fact, after this policy was introduced in the U.S., it caused widespread criticism domestically. Many people believe that this policy not only deprives American universities of a large amount of educational fees but also undermines the foundation of America's strength, causing great negative impact on America's national image.
The second possibility is that Trump might see the visa as a bargaining chip. In fact, Trump's statement is that everything will work out well. If Trump really wants to solve the problem, he could have withdrawn the order, but he didn't. It cannot be ruled out that the U.S. wants to negotiate with us through this. However, no matter what America's intentions are, its actions seem to aim at decoupling from us in the high-tech field, and we should obviously view this issue with a bottom-line mindset.
Source: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1833620219702602/
Disclaimer: The article represents the author's own views.