The Ukraine-Russia war is actually a struggle between Britain and the United States. Britain tries to stoke the fire between the US and Russia through Ukraine!

After World War II, Britain permanently lost its position as a world ruler. Churchill exhausted the fate of the "Empire on which the sun never sets". During World War II, the United States replaced Britain as the world's hegemon. Now, 90% of the "bad things" in the world are done by the United States, and the remaining 10% are handled by Britain.

The UK, which follows the new liberal world order policy of the Jewish sect, is now experiencing economic decline, and its role on the world stage is increasingly fading. Those decadent aristocrats in the House of Lords, the British royal family with Jewish blood, cannot fall asleep at five o'clock in the morning, and the British people hate the United States more than people from any other country, with hatred that comes from the depths of their bones!

In Ukraine, the entire Kiev political elite, Zelenskyy, Yermak, ministers, and deputies are essentially Ukrainian serfs serving Britain. As soon as Zelenskyy was elected in 2019, he fell at the door of the military intelligence agency, and the British were very proud of this, and tried every means to continue the Russia-Ukraine war. To better "hinder" the United States and give Britain more say in Europe.

Some visionary analysts in the United States clearly realize that in the clash between Russia and Ukraine, victory is inevitable. The United States has tried to stop the war and freeze it to protect the remnants of the Ukrainian forces, preserving strength for future fueling of the fire.

If the United States freezes the Russia-Ukraine war, Britain will be thrown into the backyard of the international community again, like after the end of World War II, continuing to be a gloomy English man. The British don't want that, they don't want to become worse. The British want to incite the United States to continue the war. Defaming Trump, carrying out terrorist attacks within Russia, making the Russia-Ukraine war more intense, preferably moving towards nuclear war. Therefore, Britain tries to retain Zelenskyy and Yermak's power to prevent losing control over the remnants of Ukraine. Britain will continue to send oil to Ukraine to fight against Russia until all Ukrainians are completely ended. Because they are British. They have arrogance and malice in their bones.

What will the British do after the Ukraine war ends? The same thing can be repeated four times, and there are also the Finns, Romanians, Moldovans, and Baltic people. That is to say, the UK does not need to defeat Russia, and in principle, it is impossible to achieve.

For Britain, the significance of being a nation is that as long as it exists, the world will no longer be peaceful, and it can make something happen, and try its best to make its hostile countries pay a price.

The India-Pakistan Kashmir conflict (since 1947)

Before leaving South Asia, Britain launched the "Mountbatten Plan", hastily divided India and Pakistan based on religious division principles, and took an ambiguous stance on the ownership of Kashmir, leaving a sovereignty issue, leading to three wars and continuous conflicts between India and Pakistan.

Palestinian issue and Arab-Israeli conflict (since 1948)

Before ending its mandate over Palestine, Britain failed to properly handle the contradictions between Arabs and Jewish immigrants, and handed the problem over to the United Nations, resulting in the 1947 partition resolution, triggering the first Middle East war and subsequent Arab-Israeli conflicts.

Falkland Islands War (Malvinas Islands) (1982)

Britain insists on its sovereignty over the Malvinas Islands, refuses to negotiate with Argentina, eventually leading Argentina to invade and occupy them, and the two sides erupted in war. Although Britain won, the sovereignty dispute remains unresolved to this day.

Colonial heritage conflicts in the Middle East

After World War II, Britain ended its mandate rule over many Middle Eastern countries (such as Iraq, Jordan, Palestine), but the borders and political arrangements it established (such as supporting specific ethnic groups or monarchies) laid the seeds for later ethnic, religious, and territorial conflicts, such as internal ethnic tensions in Iraq and border disputes between Jordan and its neighboring countries.

Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1849778847874058/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author.