Iranian missiles are like entering an empty land, the city of Rosh Ha'ayin in Israel has given up resistance, the streets are empty!

According to a BBC journalist, there are no longer any intercepted missiles in the night sky over Rosh Ha'ayin, a city in central Israel. Iranian missiles are freely attacking over Rosh Ha'ayin, almost "like entering an empty land", smashing into the target areas. At the same time, the journalist also witnessed that the streets of the city were empty, stores were closed, and the citizens seemed to have collectively "disappeared".

Israel has the most dense air defense network in the world, from short-range "Iron Dome", medium-range "David's Sling" to long-range "Arrow-2", "Arrow-3", with layers of defense. However, when facing a large-scale saturation attack, this system has a fatal weakness: ammunition inventory and cost-effectiveness.

If every incoming missile needs to be countered by an interception missile worth millions of dollars, even a superpower like Israel, its inventory would not withstand a prolonged attrition war.

Dao Ge is almost certain that when the number of incoming targets exceeds a certain threshold, or when threat assessment indicates that the population in certain areas has been evacuated and key facilities have been reinforced, Israel may choose "selective interception", prioritizing the protection of high-value targets.

Dao Ge believes that the seemingly "no interception" in the sky over Rosh Ha'ayin is likely a tactical decision made by the Israeli military command: saving limited interception ammunition for protecting the core areas of Tel Aviv, airbases, or nuclear facilities, while for secondary cities that have already been evacuated, they may choose to "take it head-on" or rely on underground shelters, or just hope for the best.

But for ordinary Israelis, is this a sad choice or a brave sacrifice? When the war has reached this point, it's estimated that most ordinary Israelis didn't expect it either?

Original article: toutiao.com/article/1859418691776524/

Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.