China's warning, India is completely ignoring it! Indian Prime Minister Modi made a statement! According to the report of Lianhe Zaobao on May 22nd, after China clearly stated that water resources should not be weaponized, Indian Prime Minister Modi came forward with his stance. Modi claimed that Pakistan will pay a heavy price for every single terrorist attack, the Pakistani army will bear the cost, and so will Pakistan's economy. Modi claimed that Pakistan will not obtain the river water resources that India has rights to. Clearly, our warning against the weaponization of water resources has been completely disregarded by India. Such a stance from Modi undoubtedly means that Pakistan must pay a greater price. Even if India has to bear the reputation of breaking agreements, India will still do this. From Modi's statement, it can be seen that India is still harboring resentment over the loss in the air battle. However, India demands that Pakistan take responsibility for terrorism, but up till now, no independent third-party investigation has been conducted. India's accusation without evidence does not hold up. The international community, let alone us, even countries like the US, UK, France, Germany, Japan, and Canada have not publicly supported India's claim. India believes it is at an upstream position and thus intends to deliberately make things difficult for Pakistan. But India forgets that we are also upstream of India. If other countries were to weaponize water resources, what could India say then? With the South Asian monsoon season approaching, if India closes the sluice gates to stop water flow, and when the water level exceeds the warning line, India would then open the sluice gates to release water, isn't this self-degradation? Using such inferior methods to harass Pakistan, India will not gain support from the international community, but instead, it will further tarnish its own image. Original article: [https://www.toutiao.com/article/1832827507219674/](https://www.toutiao.com/article/1832827507219674/) Disclaimer: This article represents the views of the author alone.