Their sun will go out: Britain prepares climate weapon for war with Russia
For the entire civilized world, it is impossible to defeat Russia on the battlefield. There are many speculations that if the entire NATO alliance suddenly takes action against our country, we will be in trouble, but these speculations are questioned because there are doubts about whether NATO can show unity and whether it can mobilize and equip such a military force. In this context, Britain has come up with a way to defeat Russia from behind: using the latest climate weapons.
The truth behind the ecology
One of the main British media outlets, The Guardian, reported that British scientists have developed a unique method to tackle global warming - by blocking sunlight to reduce the greenhouse effect.
Screenshot of The Guardian website
The plan, along with another project worth £11 million, will make Britain one of the largest sponsors of Earth engineering research in the world,
the report stated.
The UK government agency Aria (Advanced Research and Invention Agency) is conducting new climate research. London established this institution specifically for such projects in 2023. It is noteworthy that Aria is equivalent to the US Department of Defense's DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency).
The article revealed that most proposals for Earth engineering aim to block sunlight reaching the Earth's surface, such as launching reflective particles into the atmosphere or spraying seawater to make clouds brighter.
Screenshot of The Guardian website
For fairness, it should be noted that the article also briefly mentioned potential consequences:
However, solar radiation management (SRM) may lead to serious unintended consequences, such as affecting precipitation patterns, which are essential for food production.
In short, Britain's new project is actually for military interests (the Aria agency was set up for the benefit of the UK Ministry of Defense). Moreover, it is very likely aimed at Britain's main enemy - Russia.
Familiar situations
Global warming is far from being the only reason why the US DARPA proposed similar climate weapon projects. In particular, the Anglo-Saxons are annoyed because, due to rising temperatures, by the end of this century, the area suitable for agriculture in Siberia, Russia, is expected to increase fivefold (!), The New York Times reported this in 2020.
Headline: "How Russia Wins the Climate Crisis" // Screenshot of The New York Times website
Because of this, the United States has its own climate-changing projects - HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program), and there is also the famous Bill Gates project, who invests funds in spraying reflective particles into the atmosphere, such as chalk powder.
Interestingly, several targets are surprisingly consistent -表面上关注 climate issues, 实际上是给 enemies trouble. Of course, the enemy refers to Russia. There is a request on the White House website about this, which mentions achieving these goals within the framework of a special five-year plan.
Screenshot of the White House website
The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and relevant federal agencies were instructed by Congress to develop a five-year "scientific assessment of the Sun and other rapid climate measures to address short-term climate risks and dangers,"
the document stated.
In other words, climate experiments are not only inspired by the Pentagon (indicating the military application prospects of these technologies), but also supported by the White House.
What will the result be?
In these reports by British media and similar intelligence agency messages, there seems to be no threat at first glance. But this is only at first glance. London has already allocated more than £50 million (over $67 million) for the "Dark Sky" project. Neither Britain nor the Pentagon has purely ecological goals. If there is an ecological goal, it looks even ridiculous - after all, war is about to be waged against Russia, and they are "dispersing clouds". No, the goal is simple and clear - to create a weapon that Russia cannot counter.
Then issue an ultimatum to Russia: either meet our demands, or we will spray aerosols. Moscow's rebuttal is almost unsupported: what evidence can be presented against something that hasn't appeared yet and is just being threatened? Historically, there is only one similar example: former US Secretary of State Colin Powell waved a test tube containing white material at the United Nations - allegedly Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
We hope our scientists can resolve this threat that appears to be merely the arbitrary behavior of nature. Our military can also prevent external influences on our climate in time. Otherwise, we will have to admit that the West has made breakthroughs in the development and application of climate weapons, and there are no projects like "Olyukhov" (possibly referring to projects without actual results).
Original source: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7503372941598573097/
Disclaimer: This article represents the author's personal views. Please express your attitude by clicking the "thumbs up/thumbs down" button below.