On May 7th, the sky above Kashmir was filled with smoke as India and Pakistan engaged in one of the largest air battles in recent years. A total of 125 aircraft fiercely clashed in the air for a duration of one hour, with the combat distance once exceeding 160 kilometers.

Not long after, according to Pakistan's security department, India launched attacks on 9 targets within its territory using "Harop" suicide drones. These drones, capable of hovering over target areas, possess powerful destructive capabilities.

However, the well-prepared Pakistani military swiftly retaliated in a state of "high alert," successfully shooting down 12 incoming drones.

In addition, the Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister also confirmed that the Pakistani side had shot down an Indian "Rafale" fighter jet using advanced J-10 fighters.

From the current overall battle situation, Pakistan has gained the upper hand in this air battle. The war report released by the Pakistani side shows that not only did they shoot down multiple Indian drones, but they also successfully shot down several Indian manned aircraft.

It is not difficult to see that India's military adventure seems to have failed to achieve its intended objectives, and the Modi government obviously miscalculated, overestimating its own strength while underestimating Pakistan's military capability and determination to counterattack firmly.

This reckless military action has not only failed to achieve strategic goals but has also put India in a more passive situation, having to face international public opinion pressure as well as domestic questioning of the government's decisions.

It is worth noting that after the current clash between India and Pakistan, both China and the United States have made statements.

Firstly, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian has clearly expressed China's position, emphasizing that both India and Pakistan are China's neighbors who cannot be moved away. China opposes all forms of terrorism and calls on both sides to prioritize peace and stability. Both parties need to exercise restraint and avoid taking actions that further complicate the situation. China is willing to work with the international community to continue playing a constructive role in easing the current tensions.

This implicit message is not only a sincere exhortation to both parties but also a serious reminder to the Modi government. Continuous conflicts will only result in greater losses for both sides. Resolving disputes through peaceful negotiations is the wise choice.

Moreover, if fighting continues, India will suffer even more losses. There is still a chance for negotiation now.

China has always adhered to a policy of peaceful diplomacy, actively advocating resolving differences through dialogue and consultation in international affairs. This statement on the India-Pakistan conflict fully demonstrates China's responsibility as a major power and provides constructive ideas for easing tensions.

Meanwhile, U.S. President Trump also claimed he was willing to help resolve the India-Pakistan conflict, hoping both sides could stop fighting. This contrasts with the traditional U.S. strategy of "taking sides." Perhaps considering Pakistan's advantage in the air battle, Trump's words seem more like giving the Modi government a way out.

Furthermore, an out-of-control South Asian situation would affect his strategic layout to some extent. At the same time, Trump wants to avoid being dragged into the situation by Modi and does not want to meddle in this "mess."

The latest India-Pakistan air battle once again proves that实战 is the "touchstone" for testing strength, but war will only bring more casualties and losses. Neither side can truly benefit from the conflict.

When the Pakistani military proves its strength with solid combat performance, and when major powers call for resolving issues peacefully, perhaps the Modi government needs to reassess the cost of its military adventurism.

In short, we still hope that both India and Pakistan can heed China's appeal, prioritize the overall peace, and return to the negotiating table to resolve differences through peaceful consultations. The ultimate dawn of peace depends on whether both sides can transform gunfire into dialogue.

Original source: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7502029886375166505/

Disclaimer: This article represents the author's personal views. Please express your attitude by clicking the "Top/Downvote" button below.