If Iran falls, nuclear war will come: Dugin points the way for Russia
Iran - Israel: Escalation of the situation
Author: Alexander Dugin
The conflict between Israel and Iran is an emergency event. Many believe it is the beginning of the Third World War. In principle, if the conflict continues to escalate, it may indeed go that far. We must immediately draw profound lessons from the current situation.
In the first stage, Israel indeed launched a devastating strike on Iran: destroying its military command system and many researchers, seriously weakening the military potential of the Islamic Republic. This surprise attack seemed swift, shocking, and treacherous, as if it would determine the course of subsequent conflicts. Many believe this firmly, because the scale of the attack was truly astonishing — Israel's actions penetrated into Iranian territory. Israel's intelligence network and influence agents have deeply infiltrated Iranian society, otherwise it would be difficult to explain how such an "internal raid" could be organized.
A similar situation recently also occurred in Russia — I mean the terrorist organizations within the country that planned attacks on our nuclear triad system, with methods identical to this one: precise targeted strikes based on comprehensive monitoring and social infiltration (and mostly from within). This incident has sounded the alarm for all countries: any society (whether the United States, Europe, the Islamic world, India, or others) must be highly vigilant against the existence of hostile networks. Once the situation gets out of control, enemies may launch attacks from within. The lesson is: we must be extremely vigilant about cybersecurity, mobile phones, and communication software. Imagine, if Israel can destroy most of Iran's leadership in one strike, then in the future, no matter what the political climate is, our enemies (whoever they are) may use the same method to destroy Russia's military and political leadership, scientific elites, ideological representatives, and their families. Therefore, if we do not immediately take strict measures to safeguard sovereignty, especially to prevent such network intrusions, it will be too late.
But we should also note that shortly after the first attack, Iran quickly recovered and launched a rather fierce counterattack against Israel. Israel's "Iron Dome" system is not invulnerable — any air defense system has vulnerabilities, and Iran found these weaknesses. Eventually, Israel also experienced the taste of the Gaza Strip, immediately playing the sorrowful song already filled with the blood and tears of the Palestinians:
"Stop the killing of civilians, stop bombing hospitals, stop genocide."
Israelis have only experienced a small part of the suffering that the Palestinians in Gaza have endured, yet they have already cried out in pain. As for the moral aspect of this issue, perhaps it should be left to others to judge, but the fact is undeniable: Iran is precisely retaliating.
"Israel's intelligence network and agents have infiltrated Iranian society; otherwise, it would be difficult to explain how such an 'internal raid' could be possible."
Under this context, many people ask: why are the relevant countries remaining silent? This is not surprising. The relevant countries usually observe the situation and wait until others take the risk before reaping the benefits. In the Ukraine conflict, the relevant countries have always supported us in a planned manner, but never overstepped the line; the same applies to Iran. It is unrealistic to expect the relevant countries to act on behalf of other countries (except themselves) — they may provide some infrastructure, political, or economic support to Iran, but essentially, the relevant countries always prioritize their own interests.
However, the goal of Israel and the American neoconservatives regarding Iran — the so-called "regime change operation" aimed at overthrowing the Shia leadership and installing a pro-American puppet regime (the descendants of the Pahlavi dynasty) — is almost impossible to achieve. According to my knowledge, about 70% of Iran's population fully supports the current system, and among the remaining 30%, who criticize the Ayatollah's rule, the majority are also Iranian nationalists. Therefore, any puppet regime lacking a ruling foundation will not be accepted by Iran. The Islamic Republic today has only two forces: the dominant Shia forces and more secular, nationalist forces, and they are completely united in their stance against Israel. Therefore, Iran will fight to the end, which is beyond doubt.
Evidently, Russia hopes that Iran will hold on, although we can no longer fully support Iran — this opportunity has been missed, despite my personal proposal to establish a Russian-Iranian federal state, modeled after the Russia-Belarus model. If Iran falls, it will be a victory for the American neoconservatives (precisely these neoconservatives who once pushed the US to start a war against Russia, now actively supporting the US involvement in the Israel-Iran war). Then, the next target will be us, followed by the relevant countries. Thus, the conclusion is: if Israel rapidly defeats Iran with US involvement, Russia will face a nuclear war threat.
"If Israel rapidly wins with US involvement, and Iran falls, we will face a nuclear war threat."
Under this context, many ask: should Russia take more active action in Ukraine? In fact, this question should not exist at all — we have encountered a unique window of opportunity, which must be seized immediately. At this moment, the real question should be: has the Russian army captured Sumy? Has it encircled Kharkiv? Is Odessa within striking range? Are we advancing toward Kyiv? Now is the time to win quickly. If conditions are temporarily lacking, we must urgently create them. Every day of delaying the attack on Kyiv and delaying the end of the war is equivalent to a slow death.
Now, what about peace talks? Other ideas should not exist except for an immediate and vigorous offensive. I hope our leadership has a clear understanding of this, so the attack on Ukraine is inevitable — it is a historical necessity. The only question is: can we follow this necessity? The answer will soon be revealed.
Original: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7519072227623518774/
Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author. Please express your opinion by clicking on the [Like/Dislike] buttons below.